Home
Past Issues
May 2006
City Council to vote to halt school closings?
| City Council to vote to halt school closings? |
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 2 By George N. Schmidt If the majority of the members of the Chicago City Council hold their purpose, by the end of June there will be a major showdown over the Chicago Board of Education’s unprecedented attack on public schools via its widely opposed school closing activities. By the end of May, more than 40 aldermen out of 50 had signed on in support of a resolution that will, in effect, place a moratorium on school closings in Chicago. A vote is scheduled for the June 28 City Council meeting. June 28 is also the day of the next Chicago Board of Education meeting.
Four years ago, the Chicago Board of Education began an unprecedented attack on the city’s public schools beginningwhat has become the largest number of public school closings in American history. Although thousands of parents, teachers, students and their supporters have protested since the program of school closings was launched by schools CEO Arne Duncan in April 2002, by March 2006 the Chicago Board of Education had closed more than 30 of the city’s public schools, leaving the teachers and other people who worked in them jobless and the students facing a major — and in some cases insurmountable — disruption in their lives.
After testifying on more than a half dozen occasions in opposition to the school closings that have ravaged families in his ward, 24th Ward Alderman Michael Chandler (above, at podium) introduced a resolution in Chicago’s City Council in February 2006 demanding that the closing be stopped until a valid study can be completed showing that the closings actually help the children from the shuttered schools, as Arne Duncan and school board officials have claimed. Despite repeated requests for data covering all of the children from all of the schools that the Chicago Board of Education has closed since 2002, the Duncan administration has refused to provide such a study. Instead, the Board’s researchers have offered partial studies, which upon examination turn out to be little more than public relations for the school board’s school closing programs. By May 2006, the Duncan administration had ignored numerous requests by Substance for the studies it claimed proved that the school closings helped children. Substance photo by George N. Schmidt |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|







