Substance Archive

The Resistance | January 2003 Issue

Logic and common sense escaped Gwinett board


The following editorial, headlined “Now question the Gwinett board” was published in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution on December 19, 2002.

Finally, a saner head prevailed, ending the long-running vendetta of Gwinnett County school officials against teacher James Hope.

Hope, the Centerville Elementary Teacher of the Year, had been hounded for nearly three years for daring to complain that the expensive, high-stakes Gateway Test created by Gwinnett officials was a bad test. He posted several of the more dubious questions on a Web site to demonstrate how poorly the questions had been worded.

That act brought down the wrath of the county school board and Superintendent J. Alvin Wilbanks, who also targeted Hope as the lead suspect when someone else stole a copy of the test and mailed it to the media.

Wilbanks unleashed the school district’s police force to launch a witch hunt of Hope and parents who opposed the test. Although certified police officers, school police have neither the manpower nor time to investigate such cases, but investigate they did.

Brutishly and poorly.

Eventually, the school board, the state Professional Standards Commission and a state administrative law judge all ruled that Hope had violated the teachers’ code of ethics that prohibits teachers from copying test questions and giving them to students. In other words, they claimed he cheated, a crime for which he was reprimanded by the school board and suspended for six months by the commission.

Once the case got to court, though, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Gail S. Tuscan, ruled in favor of logic, common sense and an ability to read plain English. Tuscan said posting a few questions on the Web after the test had been administered was obviously not cheating.

“ Public policy dictates that Hope, an experienced 17-year veteran educator who works directly teaching and evaluating the very students to be tested, be able to actively participate in the public debate regarding the test and share with the concerned parties the benefit of his hands-on experience with the students, the test and its administration,” the judge ruled.

With their vendetta against Hope, school board members and Superintendent Wilbanks clearly were trying to intimidate his fellow teachers into silence. Board members also sat by and allowed Wilbanks to run roughshod over every teacher’s constitutional rights.

For that, they need to be held accountable.




Top


Home | About Us Archive | Legal | Subscribe | Contact Us