Pencil

Home


Letters PDF Print E-mail

IWW leader — poet and artist Carlos Cortez — dies
January 23, 2005
Substance Editor:

Carlos Cortez, leader of the Industrial Workers of the World — the IWW, or “Wobblies” — died in Chicago on January 18.

I have four of his books, but know less about his art except his place was an Art Museum of his works. You might just want to use today’s newspaper obituary, but I’ve put together some additional information of union stuff from his books and other sources.

He was a Woody Guthrie and much more. He came and read to the kids at Chavez Elementary School, spoke at the Haymarket memorial dedication, and read from one of his works “Where are the voices?” when they put in a new stone monument out their in the River Forest cemetery, where many labor leaders (including Haymarket martyrs) are buried.

To me it was like having met Al Raby — and yourself…

Below are a few of the materials I could gather in a short time. I hope readers will go further in learning more about this extraordinary man of the working class. Thanks again for your consideration.

John Whitfield,

Washington High School, Chicago Below are various obituaries and tributes that came out after his death.

Chicago Mourns Loss of Carlos Cortez

“Artist and Poet Carlos Cortez died of heart failure at 7:44 PM on Tuesday, January 18, 2005, at his home in Lakeview. He was surrounded by friends and listening to the music of the Texas Tornadoes when he passed away. Cortez suffered his first heart attack in 1993 and a massive heart attack a year and a half ago left him bed-ridden in his own home until he passed away. Cortez was 81 years old.

“Cortez is best known for his poetry collections published by March/Abrazo Press and Charles H. Kerr. He is also known for his art. He was a conscientious objector in WWII. A public memorial will be organized in the future. “

Carlos A. Cortez, 81, Activist Artist and Writer (Chicago, Illinois).

“Carlos A. Cortez, through his labor-oriented art and writings that helped bring international attention to Mexicans and other native peoples, died on January 18 at his home in Chicago. He was 81.

“The cause of death was heart failure, according to his doctor Teresa Ramos M.D., present at the time of his death.

“Imprisonment as a conscientious objector during World War II led to his membership in the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) union. Cortez’s support of the IWW or “Wobblies,” was central to the theme of many of his wood and linoleum-cut graphics, as well as editorial and poetic works. He was columnist and editor for the IWW union paper, The Industrial Worker, from the late 1950s to 2005, and the author of four books.

“In 1975, Cortez joined Jose G. Gonzalez to found the first Mexican arts organization in Illinois, Movimiento Artistico Chicano, MARCH, Inc. Cortez was also an active member of the Mexican Fine Arts Center Museum, Chicago Mural Group, Mexican Taller del Grabado (Mexican Graphic Workshop), Casa de la Cultura Mestizarte, the Native Men’s Song Circle and Charles H. Kerr Publishers. Cortez’s work is in the collection of the Smithsonian Institute and the Museum of Modern Art in New York.

“Cortez is survived by the relatives of his late wife Mariana Drogitis-Cortez: his sisters-in-law, Theodora Katsikakis and Lela Vlahos; brother-in-law Nicholas Drogitis; nieces Despina Katsikakis and Monica Meissner, grand niece Alexandra Kailing, and nephews Kosta Vlahos and George Vlahos.

“Memorial services are private after Mr. Cortez’s cremation in Chicago, Illinois. Those seeking to honor his memory may make a contribution to the American Indian Center at 1630 W. Wilson Ave. or the Chicago Coalition for the Homeless.”

Carlos Cortez as a Friend: Dear Chicago Poets,

“Carlos Cortez was a friend of mine. I say this with a measure of pride for a man whom I came to regard as, not only a fine artist and writer, but as extremely decent human being. Unfortunately, my first encounter with Carlos illustrates that you should never judge a man simply on externalities.

“Before I get to the details of our first meeting, let me tell you a little bit about myself, the me I was during the winter of 1987. I worked as an administrator for a major foundation in Chicago. I reviewed grant requests and loan requests, and I learned to make quick judgments and to examine the financial integrity of nonprofit applicants. I lived and ate numbers. I took the job seriously, and, honestly, I took myself equally seriously, if not more so, because working for this foundation was considered a plum Chicago job. Man, I was suffering from a major case of Yuppie-itis. After all, I was in my early thirties, making decent money, and I even owed income property in Bucktown, before it had emerged as the in-place to live. But I also was starting to publish children’s stories and poems for Arte Publico Press and its journal, Revista Chicano-riqueña. But I kept that part of my life pretty much in the background.

“I’ve always isolated myself as a writer. I didn’t know Carlos Cortez from Carlos Cumpian, and honestly, I couldn’t have cared less. I was a major twit who dressed in business suits or tweed jackets and wondered how I was going to gain literary fame while keeping my hand in the business world. Being part of a literary community was never a major concern. Then Carlos Cortez walked into my life. I was still married to the second Mrs. Varela. She, like me, held certain standards. I’m not going to tell you about these standards, but let’s just say that they gave me the means to an end.

“I also liked going out to parties hosted by other Latino-Yuppies-in-the-making. A colleague from another foundation had invited us to one he was hosting in his flat in Logan Square. Wife number two and I accepted and drove to Logan Square on a very cold January night. The music was hot, the booze flowing, and the conversation stimulating. Then from out of the darkness came this reed-thin man wearing a white cowboy hat, dressed in black with a flowing mane of white hair gathered into a ponytail, and a black mustache that seemed to go on forever. He even had on a western shirt stitched with several red skulls and a figure of a coyote howling under a red moon. He also had on a bolo tie clasped at the throat by a large silver skull. Then he smiled and said, “I hear you guys live near me. Could you give me a ride?”

“Wife number two and I just stared at this apparition. Sometimes the world comes to a screeching halt. I mean, my parents raised me up to never befriend strangers who wore cowboy apparel in the big city. Right off, I sensed that this guy was some sort of bohemian. My God, who would actually dress like that in the Roaring 80’s? Didn’t he know anything about Reaganomics and supply-side theory? And what would my stockbroker think if I actually gave someone like him a ride? But I seemed to hesitate, so wife number two squeezed my hand, which was her signal that she would kill me if I, indeed, offered him a ride, so I said no.

“Ten minutes later, the party’s host came over and said in a voice frosty with annoyance. “I just heard that you wouldn’t give Carlos Cortez a ride. I said, “Who?” He replied, “Cortez. Don’t you know him? Man, everybody loves Carlos.” I wanted to say that I never give rides to eccentrics or lunatics, but I kept my tongue in check. He huffed away. I suppose the host arranged a ride, because I saw the graveyard cowboy as he left with someone else. What was all the fuss about?

“Well, there is a lot to fuss about when it comes to Carlos Cortez. I thank God for having had the privilege of knowing him and appreciating the immerse gift he gave to me, his friendship. And he was also the most tolerant man I ever knew. After all, he even forgave me, the biggest twit in the world for being such a twit that night. Imagine I turned down the opportunity to become friends with a great artist.” (—Frank Varela)

Those who wish can find many links to Carlos Cortez’s work on the Internet.




Stewart’s dictatorial hand stifling union resistance to
Renaissance 2010

January 23, 2005
Dear Substance,

Is the UPC (United “Progressive” Caucus) playing politics with our futures? You be the judge. We live at a time when the ruling class of the U.S. is waging war for control of oil in Iraq, at a cost of thousands of lives and billions of dollars. Because of this, local school boards have to spend less money on education and exert more control over employees. In Chicago, that means, for starters, a naval academy at Senn and Renaissance 2010. The only way we can even begin to fight Ren. 2010 is by having a united union, ready to take militant action.

When I said at the January House of Delegates meeting that we need to organize a strike against Ren. 2010, CTU’s right-wing dictatorial lawyer Larry Poltrock said that was absolutely out of the question because legally we can’t do it. The laws are always stacked against the working class, but throughout history, unions have done what they needed to do despite the consequences. If we want to stop the union-busting Ren. 2010, we have to get ready to strike.

The union leaders don’t want to hear this, or anything else we might have to say which would “rock their boat” (or should I say yacht?). They have cozy positions and a cozy relationship with Arne Duncan and Michael Scott. While they give lip service to fighting Ren. 2010, actions speak louder than words. To help guarantee that House of Delegates members stay “in their place”— seated and quiet, UPC leaders moved the question period of the meetings to the end of the agenda.

In the past, the 15-minute question period following the president’s report was the only opportunity for any of the more than 800 House of Delegates members to bring up motions for consideration. Even with that, delegates had to get to the meeting early to get a seat by the mike and sometimes fight for a place in line in order to have the opportunity to speak.

At the December House meeting, Devon Morales introduced a motion during the question period requiring House approval for CTU staff contracts over $100,000. The motion ultimately passed, despite opposition from the UPC leadership. Not coincidentally, at the January House meeting, the question period was moved to the end of the agenda, (and the meeting was adjourned before we got to it). Many members objected to it being moved, pointing out that House rules require that the question period follow the President’s report. Marilyn Stewart (CTU president) said that according to the constitution, she can set the agenda however she wants. However, the constitution also says that “the decisions of the House of Delegates on Union matters shall be supreme and final.”

This dictatorial move clearly undermines the union’s ability to be a united, fighting force against Ren. 2010. By limiting our access to discussion and struggle, the UPC leaders are limiting our ability to wage the tremendous battle we need to wage to save our union from this assault by CPS and Daley. Many House of Delegates members believe this is an effort to shut us up. This move has fueled resentment and mistrust of the leadership.

When I learned that the UPC leadership plans to keep the question period at the end of the meeting, I spoke to Marilyn and tried to convince her that because this move creates disunity, she should reconsider it for the good of the union. She doesn’t see it that way. My conclusion from this is that in spite of her rhetoric, Marilyn and the UPC are not interested in really fighting Ren. 2010.

We need to educate teachers, ESPs, parents, and students about this beginning step in the destruction of our union and public education which CPS is trying to sell as being for the purpose of improving education. We need union leaders who are willing to go all the way, and not ones who shrink from doing what needs to be done to educate and organize members to use our best weapon, strike.

Carol Caref
Associate Delegate
Chicago Vocational Career Academy High School



 
< Prev   Next >